« Home | Se reduce diferencia entre AMLO y FECAL » | El PREP no proclama ganadores » | RESULTADOS PREP » | Un poco más del 2 de julio » | ¿Alemania o Italia? » | Song To Say Goodbye * 2 de julio » | 98% de casillas escrutadas » | Ganador en duda » | Ventaja actual del PAN » | Disculpas »

¿Elecciones arregladas?

El siguiente artículo lo tomamos como viene, y con esto no quiero afirmar que sea cierto, pero la información brindada por el siguiente texto resulta interesante, ya que no proviene de ningún medio o blog mexicano, lo cual lo hace aún más interesante, ya que representa información que deberíamos considerar para formarnos un criterio más amplio de lo que está ocurriendo. Con esto no quiero decir que lo publicado aquí es cierto, y que este autor se proclama en favor de un candidato, simplemente presento la información como viene, de manera objetiva e imparcial, sin emitir juicios para que ustedes formen su propia opinión.

Fuente: GuerrillaNews.com

Dispatch from Mexico City
Mon, 03 Jul 2006 05:45:37 -0700

Obrador supporters rally

By Matt Pascarella & Greg Palast
Stealing it in front of your eyes

Gore v. Bush. Kerry v. Bush. Obrador v. Calderon.

As in Florida in 2000, as in Ohio in 2004, the exit polls show the voters voted for the progressive candidate, but the race is “officially” too close to call.

But they will call it – after they steal it. Reuters News agency reports that, as of 8pm Eastern time, as voting concluded in Mexico, exit polls show Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the “left-wing” Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) leading in exit polls over Felipe Calderon of the ruling conservative National Action Party (PAN).

We’ve told you again and again: Exit polls tell us how voters say they voted, but the voters can’t tell pollsters if their vote will be counted. In Mexico, counting the vote is an art, not a science—and Calderon’s ruling crew is very artful indeed. The PAN-controlled official electoral commission, not surprisingly, has announced that the presidential tally is too close to call.

Calderon’s election is openly supported by the Bush Administration.

On the ground in Mexico City, our news team reports accusations from inside the Obrador campaign that operatives of the PAN had access to voter files which are supposed to be the sole property of the nation’s electoral commission.

We are not surprised.

This past Friday, we reported that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation had obtained Mexico’s voter files under a secret “counterterrorism” contract with database company ChoicePoint of Alpharetta, Georgia. (See BUSH TEAM HELPS RULING PARTY “FLORIDIZE” MEXICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION)

The FBI’s contractor states that, following the arrest of ChoicePoint agents by the Mexican government, the company returned or destroyed its files. The firm claims not to have known collecting this information violated Mexican law. Such files can be useful in challenging a voter’s right to cast a ballot or in preventing that vote from counting.

It is, of course, impossible to know if the FBI destroyed its own copy of the files of Mexico’s voter rolls obtained by Choicepoint or if these were then used to illegally assist the Calderon candidacy.

But we can see the results: as in the U.S., first in Florida then in Ohio, the exit polls are at odds with “official” polls.

In November 2004, U.S. Republican Senator Richard Lugar, in Kiev, cited the divergence of exit polls and official polls as solid evidence of “blatant fraud” in the vote count in Ukraine. As a result, the Bush Administration refused to recognize the Ukraine government’s official vote tally … which proves once again that Republicans are incapable of irony.

The foreign mainstream press has already announced, despite the polling discrepancies, that Mexico’s elections were fair and clean—which would be a first for that country where Obrador’s party has seen its candidates defeated by “blatant fraud” before. The change this time is that the fraud is simply less blatant.

Matt Pascarella in Mexico City. Greg Palast in London.

Greg Palast is the author of Armed Madhouse: Who’s Afraid of Osama Wolf?, China Floats Bush Sinks, the Scheme to Steal ‘08, No Child’s Behind Left and other Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class War.

Posted by anthony

Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV, Fuse and WTN. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...
Related Items
Este artículo resulta demasiado interesante, ya que proviene de un medio "alternativo", en donde se publica información sin filtros. Claro que con esto no podemos comprobar su autenticidad, pero, el autor no es "cualquier" autor, que pueda ser considerado como un principiante, o un "charlatán". Habrá que poner más atención al proceso electoral.

Leer Nota Completa

Powered by Blogger

Escribe tu E-mail para recibir los posts de UnoPuntoSeis 1.6 directo en tu correo electrónico